![]()  | 
            |||||
Just Above Sunset Archives 26 May 2003 Reviews 
                | 
            |||||
| 
               
               
               
                
  | 
            ||||||||||||||||
| 
               
               
               
                Books 
 An anti-war friend of mine in Albany, New York a few weeks ago commented that a lot of
                  the political argument about our foreign policy seemed to be... sexist?  I replied
                  with this: 
                  "Oh, I think there's still a lot of
                  the "feminization of the opponent" stuff going on.   As I think I mentioned,
                  Robert Kagan, the key theorist of the neo-conservative folks, expanded his article "Power and Weakness" which appeared in
                  Policy Review in June 2002 into an actual book -- Of Paradise and Power: American and Europe in the New World Order,
                  Knopf -- and his catch phrase "Americans are from Mars and Europeans are from Venus" is discussed all around the globe by
                  folks who like to pretend to figure out how the world wags.  He characterizes
                  Europeans as feminine -- weak and powerless, thus prone to value discussion and compromise and mutual agreement -- and Americans
                  as masculine -- strong and willing to take action to get things done without all this talk and soul-searching.  It's kind of classic.  
                  But on conservative talk radio here in Los Angeles a few weeks ago I heard a new one. 
                  The discussion was about how all these liberals constantly whine about the burned and maimed and dead civilian casualties
                  as if this were some big deal, and the fellow called such civilian casualties "Freedom Fries" -- and that was his answer to
                  the liberal bleeding hearts and to the effeminate French.  Interesting. The best review of Kagan's book I've come across is from Steve Holmes, a guy I knew in college who now teaches at
                  the University Of Chicago.  Holmes actually rips Kagan to shreds, politely. See Why We Need Europe Stephen Holmes The American Prospect  April 2003 Read the review at http://www.prospect.org/print/V14/4/holmes-s.html  And the book is -- Of Paradise and Power:
                  America and Europe in the New World Order Heres Steve's bio from the
                  University of Chicago site: At the University of Chicago,
                  Professor Stephen Holmes served as Director of the Center for the Study of Constitutionalism in Eastern Europe and as editor-in-chief
                  of the East European Constitutional Review. He has also been the Director of the Soros Foundation program for promoting
                  legal reform in Russia and Eastern Europe.  After receiving his Ph.D.
                  from Yale in 1976, Holmes taught briefly at Yale and Wesleyan Universities before becoming a member of the Institute for Advanced
                  Study in Princeton in 1978. From Princeton, he moved to Harvard University's Department of Government, where he stayed until
                  1985, the year he joined the faculty at the University of Chicago.  Holmes' research centers on the history of European liberalism and the disappointments of
                  democracy and economic liberalization after communism. In 1984, he published Benjamin Constant and the Making of Modern
                  Liberalism. Since then, he has published a number of articles on democratic and constitutional theory as well as on the
                  theoretical origins of the welfare state. In 1988, he was awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship to complete a study of the theoretical
                  foundations of liberal democracy. He was a member of the Wissenschaftskolleg in Berlin during the 1991 academic year. His
                  Anatomy of Antiliberalism appeared in 1993. And in 1995, he published Passions and Constraint: The Theory of Liberal
                  Democracy; in this work, Holmes presents a spirited vindication of classical liberalism and its notions of constitutional
                  government. He co-authored, with Cass Sunstein, a book on The Cost of Rights (Norton, 1998). 
                  [][][][] 
                  Also recommended  Imagining
                  Numbers: Particularly the Square Root of Minus Fifteen, Barry Mazur, Farrar, Straus & Giroux: 228 pp., $22  The
                  Art of the Infinite: The Pleasures of Mathematics, Robert Kaplan and Ellen  Both reviewed by Margaret Wertheim in the Los Angeles Times Sunday Book Review, May 11,
                  2003 As for mathematical theory I read Wertheim review quite carefully and thought carefully about what was being said.  It was kind of like eating ice cream too fast - fun and delicious, but you then get that brain-freeze headache. If you go to Dissertation
                  Abstracts and browse the last several decades of PhD work in American philosophy, you will see philosophy and mathematics
                  have got all mixed up together these days. 
                  Ah, more to read.... 
                  
                   
                | 
            
               
               
               
                Movies 
 A friend and I recently traded some email concerning this movie.  His revisionist
                  take on it was that Gary Cooper played a person who was a dupe of the rich.  Writing
                  from Paris he seemed to be claiming this is the core of its American myth -- the hero does the dirty work of the rich capitalists,
                  or some such thing. 
               Curiously "High Noon" was on television here in the last few
                  weeks and, yes, Gary Cooper is the underpaid fellow who makes things safe for the rich business folks and doesn't get much
                  in return.  He's lucky he got Grace Kelly to ride off into the sunset with him
                  - she's pretty ticked with him the whole time.  Many folks have, of course, seen
                  that film as an indictment of the weasels who wouldn't stand up for their friends in the McCarthy hearings.  But my friend's take on it makes sense too.  But there is a curious French aspect to it too.  | 
            
               
               
               
                Music 
    | 
            ||||||||||||||