What's God got to do with it? Plenty!
Any white person who believes in God is a Republican, and not a geologist.
Dean and Clark are now
putting more "God talk" in their speeches, and the question is whether this will help.
One would guess not.
The Jesus thing
Ann Coulter, Townhall.com, January 8, 2004
... about a month ago, the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
released a poll showing that people who regularly attend religious services supported Bush 63 percent to 37 percent, and those
who never attend religious services opposed him 62 percent to 38 percent. When you exclude blacks (as they do in Vermont),
who are overwhelmingly Baptist and overwhelmingly Democratic, and rerun the numbers, basically any white person who believes
in God is a Republican.
Your see, we are not French.
See this Reuters item: Europeans Puzzled by U.S. Mix of Faith, Politics
Fri January 9, 2004 09:37 AM ET, Tom Heneghan, Religion Editor
PARIS (Reuters) - Europeans may have some problems grasping the ins and outs of American politics
at the best of times, but the transatlantic gap never gets bigger than when candidates in the United States start talking
Democratic presidential front-runner Howard Dean has started awkwardly discussing religion on the stump,
trying to shake off a label many European politicians would covet - the most secular candidate in the race.
other Democrats jostling for a chance to challenge the openly religious President Bush have also spoken up about their faith,
Bible reading or church attendance to close their perceived "God gap" with the Republicans.
European voters accustomed
to campaigns focused on budget deficits, pension problems or immigration would be surprised to hear a political candidate
talking about praying, as Wesley Clark has done, or being "God-fearing" as John Kerry has said.
Ah, we are not a "secular"
Here are some interesting quotes:
"If a politician were to speak of his faith on the campaign trail as American politicians do,"
said Austrian analyst Peter Hajek, "the population would react by asking 'Why is he or she telling us that?'"
would come across as odd if politicians spoke too much about their religious beliefs. There would be an embarrassing shuffle
in one's seat," said James Ker-Lindsay at the Civilitas Research center on southeastern Europe.
see it as a badge of honor that they have moved beyond religion, as a victory of science and rational thinking,"
he said. "This is something Americans find dreadful about Europe, that it is a godless society."
Yes, British Prime Minister
Tony Blair has been lampooned in the press for being a committed Christian. "People in this country are rather averse to
individuals who seem holier-than-thou," religious affairs commentator Clifford Longley said.
As Reuters points
out, France takes secular logic the furthest. To ensure equal treatment as it struggles against Islamic radicalism among its
Muslim minority, it plans to ban all signs of faith including Jewish skullcaps and large crosses from public schools.
in Poland, home of Pope John Paul, the huge political role the Catholic Church played under communism is fading fast. "The
era when religion and Christian values played an influential role in political campaigns and politics has passed," said
sociologist Jacek Kucharczyk. "Politicians no longer use religious slogans to win votes."
Well, Ann Coulter
would ask just what is wrong with these people. Why do they value "rational thinking" so much?
And since when did science become truth? There are higher truths.
Even the National Park Service knows this.
They are strongly resisting the pressure they are receiving now. The Grand Canyon cannot be more then six thousand years old,
not millions of years old.
See Geologists Demand Removal Of Creationist Book From Grand Canyon Bookstores
Jeremy Reynalds, The American Daily, Friday, January 09, 2004
A new book offering an alternative view of how the Grand Canyon was formed is the object of a book- banning effort by prominent
evolutionists, who have demanded that the Grand Canyon National Park Service remove the text from bookstores within the park.
"Grand Canyon: A Different View" is the 2003 work of Tom Vail, who collected essays from 23 contributors (most of
whom hold earned doctorates in science). His book presents a creation science viewpoint of the Canyon's formation that is
quite different than what most Canyon visitors are told.
Creation scientists present evidence that the Grand Canyon
was formed not by the slow erosion of the Colorado River over millions of years, but by a lot of water over a short period
of time. [ It was Noah's Flood, you see. ]
The controversial "Grand Canyon: A Different View" has been on sale at
the Canyon's bookstores since last fall. It quickly raised the hackles of the presidents of seven science organizations, who
jointly signed a December 16 2003 letter to the park's superintendent urging him to remove the book.
Of course this particular
controversy follows the one last year when Canyon officials required that plaques containing Biblical Psalms be removed from
the Canyon. That decision was later overturned and is now under review.
Elsewhere I sort of held the next
election would be one of class warfare. It seems it will also be one of religious warfare - with those who favor a Christian theocracy winning
And the sissy Europeans will be all aghast again.