Notes on how things seem to me from out here in Hollywood... As seen from Just Above Sunset
OF INTEREST
Click here to go there... Click here to go there...

Here you will find a few things you might want to investigate.

Support the Just Above Sunset websites...

Sponsor:

Click here to go there...

ARCHIVE
« May 2004 »
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
Photos and text, unless otherwise noted, Copyright © 2003,2004,2005,2006 - Alan M. Pavlik
Contact the Editor

Consider:

"It is better to be drunk with loss and to beat the ground, than to let the deeper things gradually escape."

- I. Compton-Burnett, letter to Francis King (1969)

"Cynical realism – it is the intelligent man’s best excuse for doing nothing in an intolerable situation."

- Aldous Huxley, "Time Must Have a Stop"







Site Meter
Technorati Profile

Tuesday, 11 May 2004

Topic: Iraq

Just Kidding

Many political sites are pointing back to this. What happened? No one told the woman? We weren't supposed to notice nothing like this actually happened? Quite curious.

See Rice will manage Iraq's 'new phase'
Judy Keen, USA TODAY - Posted 10/6/2003 10:02 PM - Updated 10/7/2003 6:52 AM
WASHINGTON -- President Bush is giving his national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, the authority to manage postwar Iraq and the rebuilding of Afghanistan.

While some saw it as a sign of frustration with the handling of postwar efforts, Bush and other officials said the move is a logical next step and reflected no dissatisfaction with progress.

"We want to cut through the red tape and make sure that we're getting the assistance there quickly so that they can carry out their priorities," Bush spokesman Scott McClellan said. "It's a new phase, a different phase we're entering."

Rice will head the Iraq Stabilization Group, which will have coordinating committees on counterterrorism, economic development, political affairs and media messages. Each committee will be headed by a Rice deputy and include representatives of the State, Defense and Treasury departments and the CIA.
Or maybe all this stuff about the prison abuse photos and the odd quasi-siege of Fallujah and the Sunni uprising being joined by the Shiites and everything else is not the result of anything Rumsfeld has done. It's that Rice woman. One wonders what she's planning for close-of-business on June 30 when we hand Iraq over to what in the world of professional sports are referred to as "players to be named later."

No. One needs to take press releases with a grain of salt. Just an idea, quietly abandoned. Our press, left and right, did not follow up, as we don't want to make our leader seem... feckless? Heavens forefend!

And folks wonder why no one takes what the administration says at face value. But it would be useful if when they say things like this someone in the background holds up a sign that reads "Just Kidding" - or one that says "We May Actually Do This." That might help.

Posted by Alan at 17:39 PDT | Post Comment | Permalink
home


Topic: For policy wonks...

Good intentions and a little fudging on the r?sum? and people get all upset....

CBS is reporting on an odd little item about some of leaders in Washington. First these CBS folks prove they hate America by airing those prison abuse photographs on 60 Minutes and undercut our noble efforts in Iraq. Remember this from Jonah Goldberg over at William F. Buckley's National Review?
Whoever leaked these pictures to the press was not doing anybody any favors. Since the case was already being handled, the release of these pictures did more harm than good. I don't blame 60 Minutes for running them - though I don't applaud them either. But a person would/could be morally obligated to leak these pictures if the army was covering it up or refusing to investigate. It doesn't sound like that was the case. So releasing the photos isn't prodding the government to do the right thing, it's encouraging millions of Arabs to hate us. That's not whistle-blowing, that's sabotage.
CBS is irresponsible, it seems.

You want the best and the brightest running the show, folks who would never let these photos be disseminated.

Well, who is running the show in Washington? From the new CBS item -
Assistant Secretary of Defense Charles Abell has a master's from Columbus University, a diploma mill Louisiana shut down. Deputy Assistant Secretary Patricia Walker lists among her degrees, a bachelor's from Pacific Western, a diploma mill banned in Oregon and under investigation in Hawaii.

CBS News requested interviews with both officials. The Pentagon turned us down, saying, "We don't consider it an issue."

But using such a degree is a crime in some states. Alan Contreras cracks down on diploma mills for Oregon, a state that's taken the lead on this issue.

"You don't want somebody with a fake degree working in Homeland Security," says Contreras. "You don't want somebody with a fake degree teaching your children or designing your bridges."

But we found employees with diploma mill degrees at the new Transportation Security Administration, the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Departments of Treasury and Education, where Rene Drouin sits on an advisory committee. He has degrees from two diploma mills including Kensington University.
So what's up with CBS? Do they want the FCC to shut them down as a subversive organization? Geez. They seem to be trying to embarrass the important people who keep us safe.

Of course, there is this view from Eric Alterman in his MSNBC daily column...
Let's recap shall we? We invaded a country that we now know posed no threat to us and enjoyed no connection whatever to those who did. In order to do so, we pulled manpower and resources away from the job of protecting us and thereby made ourselves more vulnerable to the thousands of new enemies we created with our failed, dishonest invasion. OK, what next?

How about we go through the nation we profess to be liberating, arrest a whole bunch of innocent people and then torture them -- raping a few here, killing a few there. What next?

Well, what do you say we continue to this for a year after the Red Cross alerts us both to the fact of the torture as well as the innocence of "70% to 90% of prisoners detained in Iraq since the war began last year?"

I don't know about you, but I'm having trouble understanding why, at minimum, the term "criminal negligence" is not being used here. If Rumsfeld really is responsible, and he says he is, then he should not merely be fired, but tried. I know it's more than he's willing to offer an American citizen like Jose Padilla but I'm in a generous mood. This being the Bush presidency, however, he is instead congratulated. "You are doing a superb job. You are a strong secretary of defense, and our nation owes you a debt of gratitude," says the man who has just reached the lowest popularity point of his presidency. I fear Mr. Orwell is looking more and more pollyanish every day.

I do wonder what honest supporters of the war are telling themselves now. There was no threat. There was no planning for the occupation. We are hated by the people who we professed to liberate and we have destroyed our reputation in the Arab world we were pretending to teach a lesson about democracy. The Arab-Israeli peace process is in tatters and we are reduced to begging the very same United Nations we treated so contemptuously to bail us out of the mess we've created. In the meantime, Americans are in the hundreds are being killed a year after the president proclaimed "Mission Accomplished" and we have wasted hundreds of billions of dollars and thousands of lives to make neither ourselves nor the rest of the world any safer.
Well, yes.

But we meant well. And check out those degrees on the wall!

A sort of legal point: Can there be "criminal negligence" when Bush, Rumsfeld and the rest meant well? Everyone makes mistakes now and then, even if they won't ever admit that they might have made any mistakes at all.

Don't good intentions matter? Shouldn't good intentions count for something?

Not now.

Posted by Alan at 12:05 PDT | Post Comment | Permalink
home

Monday, 10 May 2004

Topic: In these times...

Overload

What is there to say about all the news today?

Not much. In the words of James Carville - "Back in 2000 a Republican friend warned me that if I voted for Al Gore and he won, the stock market would tank, we'd lose millions of jobs, and our military would be totally overstretched. You know what? I did vote for Gore, he did win, and I'll be damned if all those things didn't come true!"

Oh well. What to make of it all?

This on the prisoner abuse business in Iraq is curious.

Brutality: the home truths
Gary Younge, The Guardian (UK), Tuesday May 11, 2004

The last two paragraphs?
Americans are as disgusted by the evidence as everybody else. But they are pretty much alone in their shock that such things could happen under their flag. To the rest of the world, everything from detentions in Guant?namo Bay to the disregard for the UN points to a leadership at the White House which regards international law and human rights as at best an encumbrance and at worst an irrelevance.

The most stark contradiction to have emerged from this episode is that many Americans see their country as a harbinger of democracy and freedom which made a mistake, and the rest of the world sees it as a bully reverting to type.
So which is it?

I suppose it doesn't matter...

And this reminds me of how I used to approach assignments that were coming due in graduate school. I'd sort of do the research, and think about what I'd say in my paper, and shuffle my index cards around, and... but I did finally have to write the damned paper.

Here's Seymour Hersh in the last weekend's New Yorker - a follow up to the first report on the prisoner abuse business in Iraq. Here he discusses how the whole thing was handled, getting the skinny from a source in the Pentagon.
Secrecy and wishful thinking, the Pentagon official said, are defining characteristics of Rumsfeld's Pentagon, and shaped its response to the reports from Abu Ghraib. "They always want to delay the release of bad news--in the hope that something good will break," he said. The habit of procrastination in the face of bad news led to disconnects between Rumsfeld and the Army staff officers who were assigned to planning for troop requirements in Iraq. A year ago, the Pentagon official told me, when it became clear that the Army would have to call up more reserve units to deal with the insurgency, "we had call-up orders that languished for thirty or forty days in the office of the Secretary of Defense."

Rumsfeld's staff always seemed to be waiting for something to turn up--for the problem to take care of itself, without any additional troops. The official explained, "They were hoping that they wouldn't have to make a decision." ...
I can understand that.

But it's a hell of a way to run a war.

Oh, and here's some wishful thinking from Josh Marshall regarding Rumsfeld -
You expect -- or perhaps better to say, you hope -- soon to see the sober, serious grown-up come along, put his hand on the guy's shoulder and say, "It's over" -- perhaps saying it a few more times, with arresting finality, until he understands.
Seems unlikely, doesn't it?

Speaking of wishful thinking, were I Paris Wednesday night....

Sonny Rollins
12 May
Olympia
28 blvd des Capucines, 9th
Tel: 01 47 42 25 49

Sigh.

Posted by Alan at 20:59 PDT | Post Comment | Permalink
Updated: Monday, 10 May 2004 21:03 PDT home

Sunday, 9 May 2004

Topic: Photos

A new issue of Just Above Sunset weekly is now online...

Click here for that.

New stuff - Bob Patterson's column and new fiction from Doctor Debbie. Guest photography. Extended and completely updated versions of ideas that started here.

And a Nash Metropolian...



Posted by Alan at 20:54 PDT | Post Comment | Permalink
Updated: Sunday, 9 May 2004 20:55 PDT home


Topic: The Culture

An evil woman....

Okay, she made a lot of folks mad when she said she wasn't a hero and she really didn't fight the mean Iraqis to her last bullet. She said she felt the military was using her, making a big deal out of something she doesn't even remember.

Now she's REALLY going to tick off the right big time, saying stuff like this, pretending it's the Christian thing to do. What would she know? What would Mel Gibson say? What will Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell say? What will Ann Coulter say?

Ann will say she's a traitor. Probably by Tuesday.

This Lynch woman doesn't understand evangelical Christianity, I guess.

See Lynch: Pray for families of mistreated Iraqi inmates
Sunday, May 9, 2004 Posted: 6:39 PM EDT (2239 GMT)
MONTGOMERY, West Virginia (AP) -- Former POW Jessica Lynch said prayers should go out to the families of Iraqi prisoners who have been mistreated by American military prison guards.

Lynch's comments came after she addressed about 150 graduating students Saturday at the West Virginia University Institute of Technology.

When asked her opinion of news reports of the mistreatment of prisoners, Lynch told reporters, "Pray for their families and keep up hope."

Lynch declined to comment on Army Pfc. Lynndie England of Fort Ashby, who is one of seven soldiers from the 372nd Military Police Company charged with mistreating Iraqi prisoners. ...
For a survey of what they said about Lynch last fall when she suggested the army was making up stuff about her, and most of what they said happened didn't happen, scan this:
One guy just called in and said "Lynch is a disgrace and proof that women shouldn't be in the military."

One caller says he "wanted to punch her teeth out."

Caller just said, "She ain't no hero."
This time the religious folks will get her good. She wants us to pray for Muslims? Ann Coulter said we should force them to covert to Christianity or kill them. Jessica is not with the program.

And just when I was starting to think I understood West Virginia....

Posted by Alan at 20:47 PDT | Post Comment | Permalink
home

Newer | Latest | Older