Notes on how things seem to me from out here in Hollywood... As seen from Just Above Sunset
OF INTEREST
Click here to go there... Click here to go there...

Here you will find a few things you might want to investigate.

Support the Just Above Sunset websites...

Sponsor:

Click here to go there...

ARCHIVE
« December 2003 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
Photos and text, unless otherwise noted, Copyright © 2003,2004,2005,2006 - Alan M. Pavlik
Contact the Editor

Consider:

"It is better to be drunk with loss and to beat the ground, than to let the deeper things gradually escape."

- I. Compton-Burnett, letter to Francis King (1969)

"Cynical realism – it is the intelligent man’s best excuse for doing nothing in an intolerable situation."

- Aldous Huxley, "Time Must Have a Stop"







Site Meter
Technorati Profile

Sunday, 7 December 2003

Topic: Iraq

More of his own supporters turn on George Bush?
Perhaps. Perhaps not. Newt Gingrich speaks out.



Two items below, in The Conservative Case Against George W. Bush I reviewed the cover story in the news issue of The American Conservative where Doug Bandow, a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute and a former Special Assistant to President Ronald Reagan, gets on George Bush's case. And now Newt Gingrich in Newsweek starts in.

See Dissent in the Bunker
Newt Gingrich, a quiet Rumsfeld confidant, thinks the U.S. went `off a cliff' in Iraq. by John Barry and Evan Thomas, NEWSWEEK, December 15, 2003 issue

This is interesting. As these two point out, Gingrich sit on the Defense Policy Board, a collection of outside experts - mostly heavyweight conservatives - who regularly consult with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. And they think disquiet in this quarter is particularly significant, since the Defense Policy Board pushed from the outset for the invasion of Iraq. And they got an exclusive interview with Gingrich.

And how does the conservative-of-conservatives think things are going over in Iraq? What does he say in the interview? Can you say "Vietnam"?
His basic point: where are the Iraqi faces in the New Iraq? "Americans can't win in Iraq," he says. "Only Iraqis can win in Iraq."

Gingrich argues that the administration has been putting far too much emphasis on a military solution and slighting the political element. "The real key here is not how many enemy do I kill. The real key is how many allies do I grow," he says. "And that is a very important metric that they just don't get." He contends that the civilian-run CPA is fairly isolated and powerless, hunkered down inside its bunker in Baghdad. The military has the money and the daily contact with the locals. But it's using the same tactics in a guerrilla struggle that led to defeat in Vietnam.

"The Army's reaction to Vietnam was not to think about it," he says. Rather than absorb the lessons of counterinsurgency, Gingrich says, the Army adopted "a deliberate strategy of amnesia because people didn't want to ever do it again."
Well, Newt always has been a bit of a loose cannon - a few months ago he wanted Bush to fire the Secretary Of State (Powell) and dissolve that department. Something about how they were all traitors for talking to foreign heads of states and other diplomats who disagreed with us. Here Gingrich, the loose cannon, seems to be rolling to the other side of the gundeck.

The interviewers also give us this:
In essence, the Americans never did transfer power. They disbanded the Iraqi Army and the government, realized that was a mistake, and quickly tried to cobble together an Iraqi police force and military. But the Iraqis in uniform today are seen by too many Iraqi citizens as American collaborators. Gingrich faults the Americans for not quickly establishing some sort of Iraqi government, however imperfect. "The idea that we are going to have a corruption-free, pristine, League of Women Voters government in Iraq on Tuesday is beyond naivete," he scoffs. "It is a self-destructive fantasy." (The White House insists that it is paying close attention to local politics and has speeded up the timetable to turn over power to the Iraqis.)

The rumor mill in the Pentagon suggests that Bush's "exit strategy" is to get American troops coming home in waves by next November's election. Obliquely, Gingrich indicates that would be a huge mistake. The guerrillas cannot be allowed to believe that they only have to outlast the Americans to win. "The only exit strategy is victory," Gingrich says. But not by brute American force. "We are not the enforcers. We are the reinforcers," says Gingrich. "The distinction between these two words is central to the next year in Iraq."
Well. It seems these sorts of ideas from this sort of man indicate something is afoot in Washington. Rats jumping from the sinking ship?

More likely it's just interagency infighting. I don't think Newt will now jump on the Howard Dean bandwagon.

Posted by Alan at 15:32 PST | Post Comment | Permalink
Updated: Tuesday, 9 December 2003 13:33 PST home

View Latest Entries